Forskningsartikler

Abstract:
Aims:
The aim of this study is to explore patterns of the lived experiences of first-generation Turkish immigrants (≥ 60 years) living and ageing in Norway regarding their experiences with healthcare services and ageing.

Design:
This study used a qualitative study.

Methods:
The sample consisted of 17 individuals aged 60 and above who were of Turkish origin, and immigrated to and living in Norway. All participants resided in the same city in the middle part of Norway. Individual face-to-face interviews were conducted between February and June 2023. All transcripts were examined using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results:
Two main themes and five subthemes were identified. The first theme was ‘Utilization of the healthcare service to their best’, with the subthemes: (a) ‘Communication through a translator: Expressing health problems’ and (b) ‘From physician to physician: Seeking a second opinion in health’. The second theme was ‘Being born in Türkiye: Aging in Norway’, with the subthemes: (a) ‘Between two worlds: Efforts to establish balance’, (b) ‘Family ties and care preferences: Understanding the care preferences’ and (c) ‘Two cultures, one life: Lifestyles’.

Conclusion:
This study reveals the experiences Turkish immigrants have with the healthcare service and ageing while living in Norway and balancing between two cultures. These findings offer a valuable perspective for healthcare providers and social workers and offer insight relevant to developing a cross-cultural healthcare service programme.

Süleyman Şahin, Büşra Nur Temür, Selma Öncel, Nilgün Aksoy, Anne-Sofie Helvik

Introduction:
Hearing impairment is associated with dementia. We aimed to clarify the association between hearing impairment and future cognitive test performance measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), adjusted for confounders, avoiding reverse causation through long follow-up.

Methods:
We used the Norwegian population-based longitudinal cohort study, The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT). At baseline, we invited all residents 20+ for an audiometric hearing assessment, and at 20+ years follow-up, we cognitively assessed all persons 70+ including MoCA adjusted for hearing impairment. We analyzed the association using linear regression.
Results:
We included 6879 persons (mean 56.1 years, standard deviation 6.2). At follow-up, the MoCA score was −0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.35, −0.14), per 10 dB increase in hearing threshold and for persons < 85 years, −0.31 (95% CI −0.42, −0.20).
Discussion:
This study finds a long-term association between hearing impairment and dose related reduced cognitive performance, particularly in those aged < 85.

Christian Myrstad, Bo Lars Engdahl, Sergi Gonzalez Costafreda, Steinar Krokstad, Gill Livingston, Geir Selbæk

Background: Spatial orientation is required for independent mobility in society. Deficits in spatial orientation can be an early symptom of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, and there is a need for brief assessment tools to identify impairments.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the construct and known-group validity of our newly developed Spatial Orientation Screening (SOS) questionnaire.

Methods: We included 132 patients with subjective cognitive decline (n = 16), mild cognitive impairment (n = 32), or all-cause dementia (n = 84) from a memory clinic and a reference group of cognitively unimpaired older adults (n = 108). The patients and their next-of-kin answered the self- and proxy-rated versions of the 4-item SOS (0-8 points) and the 10-item Questionnaire of Everyday Navigational Ability (QuENA, 0-30 points). The patients also performed the Floor Maze Test (FMT) for performance-based spatial abilities.

Results: Mean ages (SD) of the patient and reference groups were 68.6 (±7.6) years and 73.7 (±6.7) years, respectively. Construct validity between self-rated versions of the SOS and QuENA was satisfactory with rs = 0.66, between the proxy-rated versions rs = 0.61, and between the proxy-reported SOS and FMT rs = 0.49 (all p < 0.001). Known-group validity was also acceptable, with significantly higher median (IQR) SOS self-reported scores in patients 1.0 (2.0) compared to the reference group 0.2 (0.5) points, (p < 0.001). Informants reported more severe impairments compared to the patients’ self-reports on both SOS and QuENA (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The SOS had satisfactory validity for use as a screening instrument for assessment of spatial orientation in memory clinic patients.

Gro Gujord Tangen, Knut Engedal, Karin Persson, Geir Selbæk, Shams Dakhil, Riona McArdle, Marit Mjørud, Janne Røsvik, Anne Marit Mengshoel, Anne Brita Knapskog

Introduction
Informal care estimates for use in health-economic models are lacking. We aimed to estimate the association between informal care time and dementia symptoms across Europe.
Methods
A secondary analysis was performed on 13,529 observations in 5,369 persons from 9 European pooled cohort or trial studies in community-dwelling persons with dementia. A mixed regression model was fitted to time spent on instrumental or basic activities of daily living using disease severity and demographic characteristics.
Results
Daily informal care time was 0.5 hours higher in moderate compared to mild and 1.3h higher in severe compared to mild cognitive impairment. Likewise, this was 1.2h and 2.7h for functional disability and 0.3h and 0.6h for behavioral symptoms in the same directions.
Discussion
Estimates can be used in both single- and multi-domain health-economic models for dementia in European settings.

Ron Handels, Somboon Hataiyusuk, Anders Wimo, Anders Sköldunger, Christian Bakker, Anja Bieber, Alfonso Ciccone, Carlo Alberto Defanti, Andrea Fabbo, Sara Fascendini, Lutz Frölich, Chloé Gervès-Pinquié, Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Kate Irving, Raymond Koopmans, Patrizia Mecocci, Paola Merlo, Bernhard Michalowsky, Oliver Peters, Yolande Pijnenburg, Óscar Ribeiro, Geir Salbaek, Larissa Schwarzkopf, Hilde Verbeek, Marjolein de Vugt, Bob Woods, Orazio Zanetti, Bengt Winblad, Linus Jönsson; Actifcare consortium, ICTUS/DSA group, PLASA/DSA group, RECAGE consortium, RightTimePlaceCare consortium

Abstract:
Introduction
Repetitive head impacts (RHI) in sports
may represent a risk factor for long-term
cognitive and neurological sequelae. Recent studies have identified an association between playing football at the top level and an elevated risk of cognitive impairment and neurodegenerative disease. However, these were conducted on men, and there is a knowledge gap
regarding these risks in female athletes. This study aims to investigate the effect of head impacts on brain health in female former top-level football players.

Methods and analysis This is a prospective cohort study, enroling female former football players and top-level athletes from sports without an inherent risk of RHI. All participants are born in 1980 or earlier. We plan to perform follow-up assessments at least three times over 20 years. The protocol includes neurocognitive assessments, self-reported
neurocognitive outcomes, neurological
examination, advanced brain MRI, and fluid biomarkers.
Ethics and dissemination
The study has been approved by the South-East Regional Ethics Committee
for Medical Research in Norway (2023/178330) and the Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and
Research (SIKT). A Data Protection Impact Assessment was developed by the research group and approved by SIKT and the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences.
We will disseminate the results through peer-reviewed publications, academic conference presentations and webinars. We will communicate with the public and
key stakeholders in football worldwide to inform and promote the development and implementation of potential preventive measures based on our study findings.

Sara Christina Dahlén , John Bjørneboe, Stian Kirkerud Sandmo, Lena Bache-Mathisen, Peter Filipcik, Emilie Isager Howe, Einar August Høgestøl, Geir Selbæk , Truls Straume-Næsheim, Lars T Westlye, Roald Bahr & Thor Einar Andersen

Abstract:

Purpose: Being a young carer of a parent with dementia can be challenging, with many carers undertaking various practical and caring tasks. The weekend course Time to be young? gathers young carers, aiming to support them to cope with their challenges in everyday life. The aim of this study was to explore their role as a caregiver and the experienced impact of the course on their strategies of coping in their everyday life.

Participants and Methods: The study had a qualitative descriptive design inspired by Lindseth and Norberg’s phenomenological hermeneutical method, using individual semi-structured interviews for data collection. The participants were recruited from former participants of the course Time to be young?, and the final sample included eight participants.
Results: Through the analysis, four main themes were identified: 1) Help to accept the situation, 2) A sense of community, 3) The need for information and 4) The need to live one’s own life. The study found that attendance at Time to be young? for young adults having a parent with dementia affected their coping strategies in their situation as a young care.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated the importance of courses like Time to be young?, and need for a meeting place, tailored information about dementia, and an opportunity to share and reflect upon their experiences as a young carer.

Celine Haaland-Johansen, Ingebjørg Haugen & Anne Marie Mork Rokstad

Abstract:

Background and objective: Whether radical prostate cancer treatment affects long-term physical performance and physical activity in older men is not known. We aimed to compare physical performance and self-reported physical activity between relapse-free older prostate cancer survivors and population-based controls.

Methods: A single-centre, cross-sectional study including 109 men aged ≥70 yr receiving robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (61.5%) or external beam radiotherapy (38.5%) between 2014 and 2018 was conducted. Population-based matched (age, gender, and education) controls (n = 327) were drawn from the Trøndelag Health Study. The primary (the Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] summary score) and secondary (gait speed, grip strength, one-legged balance, and the self-reported Physical Activity Index) outcomes were compared between survivors and controls by adjusted linear mixed models.

Key findings and limitations: The SPPB score, gait speed, and Physical Activity Index did not differ between survivors (mean age 78.3 yr, mean time since treatment 52.9 mo) and controls (mean age 78.2 yr). Survivors had slightly poorer grip strength (regression coefficient [RC] -5.81, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.46; -4.17) and one-legged balance (RC -4.36, p < 0.001, 95% CI -6.72; -2.00; adjusted models), but the clinical significance is uncertain. Small sample size and potential selection of the fittest survivors are limitations that may reduce the generalisability of our findings.

Conclusions and clinical implications: 3 to 8 yr after radical prostate cancer treatment, older men’s overall physical performance and physical activity level were comparable with those of matched controls. This suggests that the treatment had little impact on functional status.

Patient summary: In this study, we investigated physical function in older men several years after they had undergone curatively intended treatment for prostate cancer in comparison with men in a general population of the same age and education. We found that physical function was similar, except slightly poorer grip strength and balance on one leg in men treated for prostate cancer. We conclude that the overall physical function was comparable with that of the general population and believe that this indicates that prostate cancer treatment was well tolerated despite older age.

Reidun Sletten, Marit Slaaen, Line Merethe Oldervoll, Håvard Kjesbu Skjellegrind, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Lennart Åstrøm, Øyvind Kirkevold, Sverre Bergh, Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Siri Rostoft, Asta Bye, Paul Jarle Mork & Ola Berger Christiansen

Online ahead of print.

Background: Sense of coherence (SOC) is a disposition to perceive things as comprehensible, manageable and meaningful. Lower SOC is associated with subjective burden and psychological morbidity in family caregivers, including in dementia. However, the evidence-base mainly comprises small-scale or cross-sectional studies. More should be known about SOC stability, causal relationships, and international contexts. We aimed to study longitudinal links between dementia caregivers’ SOC, subjective burden, and anxiety and depression symptoms in a multinational sample.

Methods: We analyzed the EU-Actifcare cohort (451 dyads of community-dwelling people with mild-moderate dementia and their caregivers). Caregivers’ assessments included: SOC scale, Relatives’ Stress Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A cross-lagged panel model was used to investigate associations between these measures at baseline, 6 and 12-month follow-ups, controlling for covariates.

Results: Caregivers’ subjective burden, anxiety and depression symptoms increased over time, SOC remaining overall stable. Considering the first six-month follow-up, we found bidirectional relationships between SOC and subjective burden, and SOC and anxiety symptoms, while lower SOC predicted depression symptoms but not vice versa. For the remaining follow-up period, both anxiety and depression symptoms predicted lower SOC but not vice versa.

Limitations: Convenience sampling precludes full generalizability.

Conclusions: This large longitudinal study shed more light on interplays between SOC, subjective burden and mental health outcomes in dementia caregivers. Findings were consistent with SOC potential protective role against burden and psychological morbidity. However, they also supported reverse causality regarding part of the associations. Caregivers’ SOC levels may be directly influenced by subjective burden and psychological morbidity.

Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Maria J Marques, Regina F Alves, Hannah Jelley, Claire Wolfs, Gabriele Meyer, Anja Bieber, Kate Irving, Louise Hopper, Orazio Zanetti, Daniel M Portolani, Geir Selbaek, Janne Røsvik, Anders Sköldunger, Britt-Marie Sjölund, Marjolein de Vugt, Frans Verhey, Bob Woods

Preprint

Abstract:

Mental and neurological conditions have been linked to structural brain variations. However, aside from dementia, the value of brain structural characteristics derived from brain scans for prediction is relatively low. One reason for this limitation is the clinical and biological heterogeneity inherent to such conditions. Recent studies have implicated aberrations in the cerebellum, a relatively understudied brain region, in these clinical conditions. Here, we used machine learning to test the value of individual deviations from normative cerebellar development across the lifespan (based on trained data from >27k participants) for prediction of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (n=317), bipolar disorder (BD) (n=238), schizophrenia (SZ) (n=195), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n=122), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (n=116). We applied several atlases and derived median, variance, and percentages of extreme deviations within each region of interest. Our results show that lobular and voxel-wise cerebellar data can be used to discriminate healthy controls from ASD and SZ with moderate accuracy (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranged from 0.56 to 0.64), The strongest contributions to these predictive models were from posterior regions of the cerebellum, which are more strongly linked to higher cognitive functions than to motor control.

Milin Kim, Nitin Sharma, Esten H. Leonardsen, Saige Rutherford, Geir Selbæk, Karin Persson, Nils Eiel Steen, Olav B. Smeland, Torill Ueland, Geneviève Richard, Aikaterina Manoli, Sofie L. Valk, Dag Alnæs, Christian F. Beckman, Andre F. Marquand, Ole A. Andreassen, Lars T. Westlye, Thomas Wolfers, Torgeir Moberget