Forskningsartikler

Abstract:

Objective: What are the core capabilities physiotherapists need to deliver quality care when working with people with dementia and their families/caregivers?

Design: A three-round modified e-Delphi study.

Participants: Panel members were physiotherapists experienced in working with people with dementia and/or educating and/or researching in the dementia field.

Methods: A steering group (16 international physiotherapists and a consumer) developed a draft framework including 129 core capabilities across 5 domains for panel members to rate their appropriateness for inclusion as a core capability to provide high quality care to people with dementia and their caregivers/families. The RAND/UCLA method was used to assess consensus.

Results: Thirty-five physiotherapists from 11 countries participated in Round 1, 31 (89%) in Round 2 and 28 (80% of Round 1) in Round 3. All core capabilities were rated appropriate for inclusion in each round. Panel members recommended wording refinements across the rounds and suggested 51 core capabilities for consideration. Three rounds were needed to reach consensus, resulting in 137 core capabilities rated appropriate for inclusion across 5 domains: 1) Knowledge and understanding, n = 36; 2) Assessment, n = 39; 3) Management, interventions and prevention n = 40; 4) Communication, therapeutic relationship and person-centred care, n = 17; and 5) Physiotherapists self-management and improvement, n = 5.

Conclusions: This e-Delphi study outlines the core capabilities physiotherapists need to provide high quality care to people with dementia and their families/caregivers. These core capabilities can be used by physiotherapists to help identify knowledge/skill gaps, as well as by educators to improve their training of undergraduate and postgraduate students, and clinicians.

Morag E Taylor, Karen Sverdrup, Julie Ries, Erik Rosendahl, Gro Gujord Tangen, Elisabeth Telenius, Katherine Lawler, Keith Hill, Annika Toots, Hans Hobbelen, Vanina Dal Bello-Haas, Abi Hall, Susan W Hunter, Victoria A Goodwin, Julie Whitney, Michele L Callisaya

Abstract

Background: Frail people receiving home care services face an increased risk of developing crisis, which can result in adverse events, coercive measures, and acute institutionalisation. The prevalence of frailty is expected to increase due to the ageing population in most countries. However, our knowledge of the process leading to crises among frail community-dwelling patients remains limited. The aim of our study was to explore how users of home care services and their next of kin experienced crises and how these crises were approached by home care services.

Methods: A qualitative explorative design with 21 interviews was conducted. We explored crises within the last year that had led to an acute institutionalisation (hospital or nursing home) or to an unstable situation with high risk of institutionalisation. Systematic text condensation (STC) was used to analyse the data.

Results: Our findings are summarised into one overarching theme; an organisation working mainly reactively instead of proactively, which is supported by four subthemes: (1) insufficient communication-a determinant of crises, (2) the lack of a holistic approach, (3) a sense of being a burden, and (4) the complexity of crises. The reactive approach is demonstrated in the participant’s experience of insufficient communication and the lack of a holistic approach from the service, but also in the user’s sense of being a burden, which seems to be reinforced by the experienced busyness from the staff in the home care services. This reactive approach to crises seems to have contributed to difficulties in detecting the various stressors involved in the complex process leading to crisis.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that home care services tend to be characterised by a reactive approach to rising instability and the development of crises for users. This can be interpreted as an emergent property of the organisation and the adaptation towards exceeding demands due to insufficient capacity in health care services. We recommend the use of multicomponent care programmes comprising interdisciplinary case conferences in home care services to implement a cultural change that can shift the service from a reactive, fragmented, and task-oriented approach to a more proactive approach.

Janne Myhre, Sverre Bergh, Øyvind Kirkevold and Bjørn Lichtwarck

Purpose
Information about outcomes of particular relevance to older prostate cancer survivors is limited. This study aimed to compare health, activities of daily living (ADL), and use of health care services between survivors and matched controls.

Methods
A single-centre study on men treated for prostate cancer with curative intent at the age ≥ 70 years 2 to 7 years earlier. Controls matched on age and education were drawn (1:3) from the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) in Norway. Self-reported general health, independence in ADL and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), hospital admissions and emergency room visits were compared by estimating non-adjusted and adjusted (age, education, comorbidity, cohabitant status and pack years of smoking) regression models.

Results
The majority of both survivors (N = 233) and controls (N = 699) reported good (58.7% vs. 62.7%) or very good (11.2% vs. 6.8%) health and independence in ADL (95.6% vs. 96.3%) and IADL (82.7% vs. 81.9%). Hospital admission was reported by 17.3% vs. 18.2% and emergency room visit by 23.6% vs. 26.7%. Regression models showed no significant differences between survivors and controls.

Conclusions
Older prostate cancer survivors reported similar health, independence in ADL and use of emergency room and hospital admissions as matched controls.

Implications for Cancer Survivors.

This study shows that survivors after curatively intended treatment of prostate cancer have as good health as matched controls, indicating that many patients tolerate such treatment well despite being of old age and that current practice for selection of patients offered such treatment is appropriate.

Sletten, Reidun & Jordhoy, Marit & Oldervoll, Line & Skjellegrind, Håvard & Saltyte Benth, Jurate & Åstrøm, Lennart & Kirkevold, Øyvind & Bergh, Sverre & Grønberg, Bjørn & Rostoft, Siri & Bye, Asta & Mork, Paul & Christiansen, Ola